
Wednesday, May 07, 2025
In early 2025, California Assemblymember Matt Haney introduced AB 1248, a sweeping legislative proposal that—if enacted—will prohibit most ancillary rental housing fees starting in January 2026. While framed as a tenant protection measure, the bill carries significant operational and financial consequences for multifamily investors, asset managers, and property owners operating in California.
At its core, AB 1248 restricts rental housing providers to charging only three specific categories of fees for new tenancies initiated on or after January 1, 2026:
● Security deposits
● Rent stabilization fees, where authorized by local ordinances
● Submetered water service charges
While late fees may be permissible “to the extent otherwise permitted by law,” California’s current legal framework lacks clarity—potentially exposing landlords to compliance risks even when acting in good faith.
What’s most disruptive is the prohibition of common and previously lawful fees that have long underpinned fee-based income strategies for multifamily owners. These include:
● Ratio Utility Billing Systems (RUBS): Often used to allocate water, sewer, and trash costs proportionately among tenants.
● Fees for bounced checks
● Optional charges: Parking, laundry, pet rent, gym access, or community room reservations
By eliminating these revenue streams, AB 1248 threatens to compress net operating income (NOI), disrupt cap rate assumptions, and potentially devalue income-producing assets across the state.
Unlike most tenant protection bills, AB 1248 introduces a dual compliance standard based on the tenancy start date. Critically, the bill:
● Bars any fee increases during existing tenancies—even if a tenant requests additional services or utility costs spike
● Allows local jurisdictions to adopt even more restrictive rules, creating a compliance patchwork that undermines uniform asset management strategies
● Introduces ambiguous language around rent discounts and payment allocations, potentially exposing owners to penalties, attorney’s fees, and treble damages for violations
Moreover, the law prohibits tenants from waiving any rights—even voluntarily—and bars landlords from passing through fees imposed by third-party vendors.
For institutional investors, REITs, and private equity sponsors with exposure to California multifamily assets, AB 1248 demands immediate attention. Key strategies to consider include:
● Stress-testing portfolio models to reflect the loss of ancillary income streams
● Revisiting lease structuring to ensure compliance while maximizing allowed revenue
● Advocating for clarity on late fees and third-party passthroughs
● Preparing for litigation exposure, particularly in jurisdictions with tenant-friendly courts
Investors must also evaluate how these changes will affect underwriting assumptions, especially for new acquisitions in high-regulation metros like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Oakland.
California’s AB 1248 is more than just a regulatory change—it’s a signal of broader legislative momentum targeting landlord fee structures. For CRE professionals, success will hinge on agile compliance strategies, proactive advocacy, and underwriting that reflects a new risk calculus.
As always, the best defense in commercial real estate is foresight.

REAL ESTATE BROKER / ENTREPRENEUR
Sanjeev Advani is a seasoned real estate entrepreneur and financial strategist from Bakersfield, California. Having built and sold his Company Synergy Property Management, he specializes in innovative investment solutions and portfolio growth. With a rich background spanning real estate, financial planning, and community leadership, Sanjeev brings a blend of tenacity, expertise, and visionary thinking to every endeavor. Dedicated to excellence and driven by a passion for empowerment, he is committed to guiding clients and communities toward success and prosperity.
